I don’t get what difference it makes. It seems the Government is conceding that a gun was fired. If she was wounded dodging the bullets or was wounded by the bullets… either way there was a gun present. Also, it is ridiculous that an autopsy was not performed. All US murder victims get an autopsy no matter what anyone wishes.
By: theradicalmormon on December 31, 2007 at 12:17 pm
The importance of this is that the government is trying to create a certain script of the events that is not accurate. The reason being is that they failed to provide the proper protection for the future prime minister.
Bhutto-Sharif-Bhutto-Sharif….Musharraf…Bhutto-Sharif-Bhutto-Sharif-Bhutto-Sharif…is that all Pakistan ever was going to get? Then again, who are we to talk? Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton…
I don’t get what difference it makes. It seems the Government is conceding that a gun was fired. If she was wounded dodging the bullets or was wounded by the bullets… either way there was a gun present. Also, it is ridiculous that an autopsy was not performed. All US murder victims get an autopsy no matter what anyone wishes.
By: theradicalmormon on December 31, 2007
at 12:17 pm
theradicalmormon,
The importance of this is that the government is trying to create a certain script of the events that is not accurate. The reason being is that they failed to provide the proper protection for the future prime minister.
By: Daniel on December 31, 2007
at 1:05 pm
Worth reading Tareq Ali’s take on events:
http://comment.independent.co.uk/commentators/article3295851.ece
Bhutto-Sharif-Bhutto-Sharif….Musharraf…Bhutto-Sharif-Bhutto-Sharif-Bhutto-Sharif…is that all Pakistan ever was going to get? Then again, who are we to talk? Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton…
By: Non-Arab Arab on December 31, 2007
at 8:45 pm