When it comes to hard news, I generally avoid Fox–both TV and internet. ABC has the best news on the internet, in my opinion. I also prefer wacthing ABC for national news. I really like Charles Gibson.
I do enjoy watching Hannity & Colmes and The O’Reilly Factor on Fox. Good shows.
Apparently, the claim is that Fox ran with an earlier version of the story that didn’t include Ron Paul’s name. A later version did include it. Following the comments at your link seems to clear everything up.
Of course, this doesn’t mean that Faux News Corp isn’t a truly evil organization.
Truth be told, Dan, Sean has made marked improvements in his ability to be civil with those whom he disagrees. I used to turn the radio off when he talked to liberal callers (not because I dislike liberals, but because Sean was rude to the callers).
I don’t care what your viewpoint is, I always try to be respectul of others and expect the same from people on the radio.
Dan, I’d like to know what specific information you have that makes Sean Hannity a fraud and a hack. Just curious. If I were making accusations against Randi Rhodes, or another liberal talk host, I would imagine you would want to know specifics.
I made my decision that Sean Hannity was a political hack back in 2002 during the build up to the war in Iraq. I could not point you to any specifics from back then. Since then, I have not considered a word he has said. I’m sure I could do a google search for recent stuff, but it isn’t today’s stuff that turned me off to him, but his stance on the war in Iraq in 2002. He was awful.
How does that show that he is a fraud? Because he claims liberalism is on par with terrorism and despotism and evil. That’s all just hyperbolic mumbojumbo. It is the work of a partisan hack, not a real researcher.
Daniel wrote: “How does that show that he is a fraud? Because he claims liberalism is on par with terrorism and despotism and evil. That’s all just hyperbolic mumbojumbo. It is the work of a partisan hack, not a real researcher.”
Hannity could be right, too.
Liberals generally favor big government. Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini favored big government and subordination to the state. Liberals are socialists; that’s a given. Hitler and Mussolini were socialists, not to mention Stalin.
Liberals are not liberal. If they were, you would not see them so often waging personal, ad hominem attacks on their opponents rather than debating the subject.
A liberal, one would presume from the name, would be tolerant of many opinions. Not so, the American liberal. They recognize one way: their way. Everyone else is evil. Kind of like the war of words Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin waged on their opponents before they gained enough power to simmply shoot them.
It doesn’t take a whole lot of research to notice those very outstanding similarities.
I just have one thing to say here. Sean Hannity Sux. People call him a great American win in fact he hates Americans.If you listen to him real close you will infact hear that he dictates.He dictates hatred for all americans that do not agree with his beliefs.Now that is what I call a pure dictator.
This battle over fox news is pointless. If you hate the network just stop watching it. If you are liberal just go hang with keith on Countdown on MSBC or Rachel on her new show. I see no difference between MSNBC and FoX. MSNBC is the liberal version of FOX. Sean and Bill and Beck are just conserative versions of Rachel,keith, and charlie gibson. In fact Air amercia and NPR are like liberal versions of Rush. Both sides have networks that cater to them . Somebody is watching FOX because msnbc has low ratings.