The Politicization of the Department of Justice

April 20, 2007 at 3:18 pm | Posted in American politics, Bush Administration | Leave a comment

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island (God bless Rhode Islanders for voting him in!), I think gets the best moment in yesterday’s grilling of the “loyal Bushie” Gonzales. Think Progress has the video and the transcript.

Basically what it comes down to is the following transcription:

WHITEHOUSE: Back to structure again, Attorney General Gonzales. I assume that we can agree with the proposition that in the enforcement of the laws the Department of Justice should be independent.

GONZALES: Yes, sir.

WHITEHOUSE: Can we also agree that one of the institutions of government that the Department of Justice needs to be independent from, in the enforcement of the laws is the White House?

GONZALES: No question about it, Senator. If you’re talking about prosecuting someone in the White House, yes, we should be independent from them when we’re making those kind of decisions.

WHITEHOUSE: And, indeed, over long history there have been concerns about influence from the White House to the Department of Justice, and people, indeed members of this committee, have expressed concern about the White House-Justice connection over many years. Is that not also correct?

GONZALES: I think that’s a legitimate concern. I think that’s very important. I think it’s one of the reasons, for example, that Attorney General Ashcroft recused himself in connection with the Plame investigation.

WHITEHOUSE: The documents that I have given you are two letters. One is from Attorney General Reno to Lloyd Cutler, the special counsel of the president, dated September 29th, 1994. It lays out the policy for contacts between the White House and the Department of Justice in the Clinton administration.

And to give credit where credit is due, it’s my understanding that the distinguished Senator Hatch, who was then the chairman of this committee, had substantial interest in this and viewed it as a significant area of oversight. And I want to commend him for that.

And what it does — the language is behind me — it says that, with regard to initial contacts involving criminal or civil matters, they should only involve the White House counsel or deputy counsel, or the president or vice president, and the attorney general or deputy or associate attorney general, period.

The more recent memorandum, the other document that you have in front of you is from April 15th, 2002. It represents the policy of the Bush administration regarding White House-Department of Justice contacts.

And there, in the highlighted part on the front, it says that these contacts regarding pending criminal investigations and criminal cases should take place only between the office of the deputy attorney general and the office of the counsel to the president.

And then, if you flip back to the very last page, there’s sort of an exemption paragraph that exempts further the president, the vice president, the counsel to the president, national security and Homeland Security officials, staff members of the office of the attorney general as so designated, and staff of the office of the president, the office of the vice president, the office of the counsel to the president, the National Security Council and the office of Homeland Security.

So I asked my staff to take a look at what the difference was between those two in effect, and if you could.

This is in effect during the previous administration. This is the Clinton protocol. And there were four people — the president, the vice president, the deputy White House counsel and the White House counsel — who could participate in these kind of discussions about cases and matters and initiate them with the Department of Justice.

And on the Department of Justice side, the only people who were qualified to engage in those discussions were the attorney general, the deputy attorney general and the associate attorney general.

So they had narrowed very carefully the field of people who could have these discussions, which I think is a very important safeguard — to narrow that porthole, to police it. It’s almost like there’s an airlock there for those communications.

Now, here’s the result that I asked my staff to put together, if you count all the people who are eligible under the new program.

That, to me — your staff can check on exactly how accurately we’ve done it — but there are, I want to say, five — what were the numbers?

(CROSSTALK)

WHITEHOUSE: 417 folks in the White House who are eligible to have these contacts and…

(CROSSTALK)

WHITEHOUSE: About 30-some in the Department of Justice.

What beautiful masterful point is Senator Whitehouse attempting to make? Under Clinton, only four White House officials could have contacts with the Justice Department: the President, the Vice President, the deputy White House counsel, and the White House counsel. Why such few? So that the Justice department would be independent of the White House, and could prosecute without any doubt of collusion, any White House person caught in corruption or malfeasance.

Under the Bush administration FOUR HUNDRED SEVENTEEN White House officials have contacts with THIRTY Justice Department officials.

How can anyone trust that the Justice Department is NOT a politicized arm of the White House?

Leave a Comment »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.

%d bloggers like this: