I’m totally with you on Mike Huckabee. He is, however, NOT a member of the Washington Establishment, and for that I am grateful. Furthermore, he will fail miserably in the general election, especially with Obama as the Democratic candidate. 🙂
I agree with you Daniel, I don’t think Huckabee would be able to win the presidency. He may well have won in Iowa, but I don’t expect him to equal his success in upcoming states, especially New Hampshire. The Huckabee surge may be over before it started.
If Huckabee is willing to take jabs at an opponent’s religion for political gain, what won’t he do? You can disagree on a lot of things, but you don’t denigrate another’s religion. Ya just don’t do that! It has to make one question his judgement on bigger issues.
I’ll agree with you on Obama. Great News. But Huckabee is not refreshing. He is the result of Rovian divisive politics
Comment by joshua madson— January 3, 2008 #
Joshua,
I’m totally with you on Mike Huckabee. He is, however, NOT a member of the Washington Establishment, and for that I am grateful. Furthermore, he will fail miserably in the general election, especially with Obama as the Democratic candidate. 🙂
Comment by Daniel— January 3, 2008 #
I agree with you Daniel, I don’t think Huckabee would be able to win the presidency. He may well have won in Iowa, but I don’t expect him to equal his success in upcoming states, especially New Hampshire. The Huckabee surge may be over before it started.
Comment by Brian D.— January 3, 2008 #
If Huckabee is willing to take jabs at an opponent’s religion for political gain, what won’t he do? You can disagree on a lot of things, but you don’t denigrate another’s religion. Ya just don’t do that! It has to make one question his judgement on bigger issues.
Comment by Dave W.— January 4, 2008 #
Since you surely weren’t watching Fox News last night, you should watch this clip. Rush Limbaugh pays a big compliment to Obama (at about 2:15).
Comment by doug— January 4, 2008 #