Make Israel Sign the Non-Nuclear Proliferation Treaty
July 3, 2010 at 5:15 pm | Posted in American politics | 11 CommentsThis is a good step in the right direction. Demand Israel be a part of the rest of the community and have its nuclear weapons declared.
The biggest worry is that Israel, with its allies in America, will undermine the Obama presidency, maybe even actively work to remove it from power here in America. After all, the status of its nuclear weapons is of vital security to Israel. Will it allow an American president to dictate or force its hands on the matter, or will they, with their allies in America, destroy the American presidency? After all, America must adhere to whatever Israel says, no matter how much it undermines America’s security. And it needs to be absolutely clear: Israel’s nuclear ambiguity is a threat to American interests and military in the Middle East. No realist ought to be kidding himself or herself about this point. The question then is, will America regain its independence once more from its new master?
11 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a Reply
Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.
Sorry I caused you pain, Dan. I feel entirely differently about you. In a good, Seinfield way. No lie.
I suppose you’re right about Israel.
Comment by annegb— July 13, 2010 #
Why are Israels nuclear weapons diametrically opposed to American security?
Comment by Do You Like Worms?— July 15, 2010 #
who said Israel’s nuclear weapons are “diametrically” opposed to American security?
Comment by Daniel— July 16, 2010 #
you did.
Comment by Do You Like Worms?— July 18, 2010 #
No, I didn’t. But you’re a stupid conservative. I shouldn’t expect you are able to understand normal English words.
Comment by Daniel— July 19, 2010 #
that’s really mature. I guess I could cut and paste your entire post into my response. But what’s the point.
Comment by Do You Like Worms?— July 19, 2010 #
the point would be that your analysis of my post is faulty, like most conservative thinking.
Comment by Daniel— July 19, 2010 #
actually the point gets lost in your childish tendency to steer the conversation off topic in an argument of semantics. I think the point should be: Little Danny needs to learn some manners, then the other kids might want to play with him more often. Ever notice that your blog isn’t exactly a hub of discussion? Think about it sport. I’d lose the purse and do something about the goatee too if I were you. Toodles.
Comment by Do You Like Worms?— July 19, 2010 #
good riddance.
Comment by Daniel— July 20, 2010 #
now, to make clear where Worms was off in his reading of my post.
He said
I didn’t talk about Israel’s nuclear weapons. I talked about Israel’s nuclear ambiguity. I don’t mind Israel having nuclear weapons. The ambiguity is a threat to our interests and our military. Make Israel sign the non-nuclear proliferation treaty so as to remove this ambiguity. Let Israel’s neighbors in the Middle East know Israel doesn’t intend on possibly using those nuclear weapons on them, thus causing them to push for their own nuclear weapons.
Now, Worms seems to have misread my comment (a normal attribute among conservatives), thinking that I believe Israel’s nuclear weapons are diametrically opposed to our security. They’re not. Worms ought to just go back and play in his Red State playpen until he grows up.
Comment by Daniel— July 20, 2010 #
Israel will never give up it’s nuclear weapons. And there is nothing these
Israel’s haters can do about. As I write Israel is building more of them;
and they are more lethal. ” Dogs bark but the caravan moves on “.
vilnius123
Comment by h. bonk— June 27, 2011 #